How to Train Consistently When Every Gym Grades Differently

Bouldering grades vary wildly between climbing gyms—sometimes by two, three, or even four V-grades—making your “level” more about the facility than your actual ability. To climb consistently and track real progress, you need a grade-independent training system that works in any gym, no matter how soft or sandbagged the setting.

The Problem Every Traveling Climber Knows Too Well

You crush V5s at your home gym. You feel strong, confident, progressing steadily. Then you travel to a new city, walk into a highly-rated gym, and can barely get up their V3s. The holds feel different. The movement style is foreign. Your confidence craters.

Is it you? The gym? The grades?

After analyzing climbing gyms across the United States, I found this scenario isn’t about your ability declining, it’s about grade inconsistency being far more extreme than most climbers realize. This confusion isn’t just frustrating, it actively derails training. When your performance metric (grade) shifts unpredictably across locations, you can’t accurately assess progress, identify weaknesses, or structure periodization. You’re navigating with a broken compass.

The solution isn’t to “just ignore grades” (unrealistic for most climbers). It’s to build a grade-independent training system that works regardless of where you climb.

Why Grades Vary (And How Much It Actually Matters)

To understand the scope of this problem, I analyzed grade ranges and setting philosophies across 40 climbing gyms in our national indoor gym dataset at IndoorClimbingGym.com, covering the West Coast, Northeast, South, and Midwest. While this is a representative snapshot rather than an exhaustive nationwide census, the patterns were consistent and revealing. [View the study, including the full dataset of the 40 gyms analyzed >> ]

The variance is significant:

Regional patterns emerged quickly. West Coast gyms split between soft circuit-based grading at many bouldering-focused facilities and notably stiff technical gyms with old-school setting philosophies. The Northeast skewed harder overall, some NYC training facilities maintain extremely stiff standards, while traditional East Coast gyms preserve old-school grit. The South trended softer, particularly in tourist-heavy markets where member satisfaction drives grading decisions. The Midwest showed the most consistency, clustering around “medium” grades.

Wall style proved to be the strongest predictor of grading philosophy. Steep, overhang-dominated gyms consistently graded harder, demanding more raw pulling power. Slab and vertical-heavy facilities skewed softer, prioritizing technical movement over strength. Volume-heavy competition-style setting prioritized flow and coordination over raw difficulty, resulting in more generous grades.

Gym type mattered more than location. Large commercial chains grade approximately one V-grade or more softer than training-focused facilities. This isn’t wrong, it reflects different business models and target audiences. But for serious climbers, it means a “V6 climber” identity is essentially meaningless without context.

The practical impact: A solid V4 climber could reasonably expect to climb V2-V6 across different gyms, depending on wall angle, hold style, and setting philosophy. That’s not minor variation, it’s a complete disruption of standard training progressions.

Three Principles for Grade-Independent Training

If grades are unreliable, what should you track instead? These three principles form the foundation of a training system that works anywhere.

1. Train Movement Patterns, Not V-Numbers

Grades measure perceived difficulty. Movement patterns measure actual competence.

Instead of “I climbed three V5s today,” your training log should read: “Worked compression, tested crimp endurance, struggled with coordination-heavy dynamic moves.”

How to Categorize Movement Patterns

Categorize every climbing session by dominant movement demand. Use five categories: compression (body tension on volumes/features), crimp-dependent (small edges, fingers), sloper/open-hand (shoulder-intensive), dynamic/coordination (momentum-based), and technical/balance (footwork precision).

Rate yourself 1-10 on each category monthly. Film yourself at different gyms attempting the same movement patterns at varying grades. You’ll quickly identify which patterns are genuine strengths versus which are inflated by your home gym’s style.

Why This Works

Movement-pattern training exploits how motor learning actually functions. The nervous system encodes climbing skills contextually, if you only train on one wall style, your neural adaptations remain narrow and gym-specific. By tracking movement competencies instead of grades, you build transferable strength that translates across any facility.

A steep gym that grades stiff will expose compression weaknesses. A slab gym will reveal footwork gaps. A comp-style gym tests coordination. Instead of feeling “weak” when grades shift, you’re gathering diagnostic data about movement limitations.

2. Use Time-Boxed Performance Testing

Gym grades fluctuate. The number of problems you can complete in 15 minutes is far more consistent.

The Testing Protocol

Every two weeks, complete a 15-minute circuit test. Choose problems two grades below your perceived maximum. Rest 90 seconds between attempts. Count successful sends, track recovery quality (are you still breathing hard after 90 seconds?), and note where you failed (pump, finger strength, bad sequence read).

Log this across different gyms. A strong benchmark might look like: “12 problems in 15 minutes, minimal pump, failed only on coordination problems I couldn’t read quickly.”

What This Reveals

If you complete 12 problems at Gym A (where you normally climb V5) but only 8 problems at Gym B (where you also climb V5), you haven’t gotten weaker. Gym B’s V3s are equivalent to Gym A’s V4s. Your actual performance capacity hasn’t changed, only the labeling system shifted.

This approach also captures work capacity and recovery efficiency, two trainable qualities that grades completely ignore. Time-boxed testing measures your anaerobic-aerobic energy system balance, revealing whether your limitation is power, endurance, or technique under fatigue.

For traveling climbers, run this test in your first week at a new gym. It calibrates your understanding of how that gym’s grading compares to your baseline, without the ego damage of failing “at your grade.”

3. Benchmark Across Styles, Not Locations

Trying to compare your V-grade across gyms is futile. Comparing your performance on similar styles is extremely valuable.

Creating Your Benchmark Problems

Identify one problem at your home gym for each major style (steep overhang, vertical crimpy, slab technical, dynamic coordination, compression). These become your “home V4 steep overhang” or “home V5 crimp endurance.”

When you visit a new gym, don’t hunt for “V5s.” Hunt for problems that match your benchmark styles. Attempt them. Ask yourself: “Did this feel easier, harder, or equivalent to my home V4 steep overhang?”

Calibrating to New Facilities

After 3-4 sessions at the new gym, you’ll know exactly how it translates. “This gym’s V5 steep problems feel like my home V4s” or “Their crimp problems are significantly stiffer, their V3 = my home V4.”

Training Application

If you’re running a strength phase emphasizing steep powerful movement, you need to know which gyms provide appropriate stimulus. A gym that grades soft on steep terrain might require you to climb their V6s to match the training load of your home V4s. Without style-based benchmarking, you’d undertrain simply because the numbers looked right.

Building Your Training Dashboard

Implementing these principles requires tracking the right metrics. Here’s a minimalist dashboard that works:

Weekly Metrics

Flash rate: Percentage of problems you send first attempt (aim for 40-60% on warm-up grades)
Project conversion: Number of sessions required to send your hardest problems (1-3 sessions = appropriate difficulty)
Movement distribution: Hours spent on each pattern type (compression, crimps, slopers, dynamic, technical)
Subjective quality score: Rate technique, energy, and confidence 1-10 each session

Monthly Assessments

15-minute circuit test results
Movement pattern self-ratings (1-10 on each of the five categories)
Max strength metrics: Max hang time, campus rung progression, weighted pull-up max

How to Use Gym Grades Correctly

Warm-up structure: Always start 3-4 grades below your max, regardless of gym
Session intensity planning: “Hard days” = at-grade projects. “Easy days” = two grades below max for volume
Ego management: Never use grades as identity. “I’m working compression patterns at the upper end of my current capacity” beats “I’m a V7 climber”

Tracking Tools

Apps like Crimpd, Kaya, or Stōkt can automate some of this tracking. A simple spreadsheet works equally well. The key is consistency, logging every session for at least 12 weeks to establish baseline patterns.

Reframing the Mental Game

The psychological shift is as important as the practical system. Grades are route labels, not identity labels. When you walk into a gym known for stiff, strength-dependent grading and their V4s shut you down, your actual climbing ability hasn’t changed. You’ve simply encountered a labeling system calibrated for a different population.

Strong climbers adapt quickly to new styles. That adaptability is the real skill worth developing. Grade variability isn’t a bug in the system, it’s a feature that exposes gaps in your movement vocabulary.

Use softer-grading gyms to build confidence and practice flow states. Use stiffer-grading facilities to reality-check your strength and expose technical weaknesses. Use your home gym for consistent progressive overload. Each serves a purpose when you stop chasing validation through numbers.

The Takeaway

Grade inconsistency isn’t going away. Commercial gyms will continue grading soft to retain members. Training facilities will maintain stiff standards to push performance. Regional cultures will diverge. Setters will prioritize different movement styles.

You can’t control the grading. You can control your training system.

Build objective benchmarks. Track movement patterns instead of V-numbers. Test performance capacity across contexts. When you decouple progress from arbitrary labels, you stop getting derailed by grade variance and start getting stronger regardless of where you climb.

Tim Hart is a climber and the founder of IndoorClimbingGym.com, a national climbing gym directory where he studies grade patterns, setting styles, and training environments across the U.S. He combines personal climbing experience with data-informed research to help climbers train and travel smarter.

Sponsored Ad